Blum CL, Chiropractic
and Dentistry in the 21st Century: Guest Editorial The
Journal of Craniomandibular Practice Jan 2004; 22(1): 1-3.
As interdisciplinary healthcare matures, understanding that patient
care should ultimately be our focus, hopefully differences can be put
aside
in light of our common goal. Within the cranial manipulative
field
mutual research cooperation between chiropractors, osteopaths, and
physical
therapists will hopefully be imminent in the 21st Century. This
is
presently happening with the multi-divisions of dentistry as relating
to
the field of craniomandibular/temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD/CMD)
and
conditions affecting condylar positions, functional orthodontic care,
and
the relationship of occlusion to the stomatognathic system and
posture.
The best way for us all to proceed is with an open mind and heart and
willingness
to learn and work together.
The Journal of Craniomandibular Practice (Cranio) has been a
guiding light for those of us in the field of TMD/CMD since its
inception in the
early 1980s. When Cranio was started there was a paucity of
literature
substantiating care of the TMJ and often times healthcare professionals
would chalk up a patient’s profound symtomatology as solely emanating
from
a psychosomatic disorder.
In the early 1980s it was common to see the chiropractic and dental
fields working separately with patients suffering with TMD/CMD.
Often times our paradigms and mode of diagnosis were completely
different. While it is not uncommon for chiropractors to treat
patients presenting with
TMJ disorders 1-13 often times that care can
reach
a “roadblock,” and the patient’s ability to improve can only be
resolved
with help from those in the dental field.
Dental - Chiropractic co-treatment models are being developed and what
appears to be essential in these early stages is educating each other
to a syntax that can be readily understood between both fields.
Initially a large obstacle between the dental and chiropractic fields
related the dynamics
of the craniofacial sutural system. The chiropractic field,
particularly those practicing Sacro Occipital Technique (SOT), worked
under the premise that the cranial and facial bones were not completely
fused in adulthood.
14-19 That concept was not readily accepted by
those
in the dental field since the whole paradigm of craniofacial
orthopedics
and orthodontics would have to be viewed in a completely new
light.
However in spite of this the dental field is beginning to open up to
these
possibilities, 20 which has also opened the door to
greater
co-treatment possibilities with the chiropractic profession.
As the issue of cranial and facial bone compliance and its affect on
occlusion and TMJ functioning has gained greater acceptance in the
dental and chiropractic fields what has become a common theme between
our professions is the relationship between the stomatognathic system
and posture. 21-24
While the pelvis and TMJ might seem to be distal and unrelated aspects
of our patient’s presenting symptoms, research is suggesting
otherwise.
25-27 “Before fitting dental splints or
equilibrating
the occlusion, the sacroiliac joints should be examined for proper
function
and any sprain should be reduced. Correspondingly, after
occlusion-altering
(or potential occlusion-altering) dental procedures, the sacroiliac
joints
should be examined for proper function to determine if they show
ongoing
functional stability.” 27 The rationale for
greater relationships between chiropractors and dentists has been
discussed in the literature, since in some cases the only possible
chance of a patient having any resolution of their TMD/CMD was
with co-treatment. 28-31
SOT chiropractors have found that patients can present with ascending
problems, which are , lower extremity, lumbosacral or cervical spine
dysfunction
or at other times descending problems which are lumbosacral or cervical
spine dysfunction secondary to craniomandibular or occlusion
imbalance.
Working together with a dentist familiar with CMD/TMD is sometimes the
only way to help patients suffering from this complex condition.
One way the professions can advance a working relationship is by
developing
methods of determining when a patient’s case is a dental or
chiropractic
primary. Presently there are no absolute gold standards, but evaluation
of the TMJ in standing, sitting, and supine postures, for instance, can
help determine if there are lower extremity, pelvic or other related
conditions
affecting the TMJ, independent of the occlusion. There are other tests
and
modalities being used by both dentists and chiropractors evaluating
neuromuscular
functionality of the body and its relationship to TMD and further need
to
be agreed upon and developed. 32
Sacro Occipital Technique Organization (SOTO) – USA is a
multidisciplinary organization formed to promote the awareness,
understanding and utilization of the Sacro Occipital
Technique method of chiropractic as
founded and developed by Major Bertrand DeJarnette, DC, DO.
SOTO-USA
has conferences and symposiums yearly and incorporate dental
chiropractic
co-treatment models, helping to integrate both professions. In
April
2003 SOTO-USA had its spring conference with BioResearch’s Annual
Conference
in Milwaukee. This past October 2003 James Carlson, DDS and
Steven
Olmos, DDS helped present a 12 hour dental chiropractic co-treatment
seminar
at the SOTO-USA Clinical Symposium in Washington, DC.
Robert Walker, DC of “Chirodontics” has often stated that “The most
complex case for a dentist is the easiest for a chiropractor to help
and the most complex case for a chiropractor is the easiest for a
dentist to help.” At the SOTO-USA dental chiropractic conferences
the most common question
is, “Where can I find a chiropractor or dentist that I can work
with?” SOTO-USA plans in the near future to have a free
directory on our website [http://www.soto-usa.org] for dentists,
chiropractors and patients who
want help with treatment or treating TMD/CMD. If you are
interested
in working with a chiropractor or dentist and would like to be a part
of
this directory, please contact SOTO-USA at (336) 760-1618 or
drcblum@aol.com
online. Aside from the possibility that our professions working
together
can be mutually advantageous, ultimately from this partnership it will
be the patient that will achieve the greatest benefit.
REFERENCES
1. Alcantara,
J, Plaugher G, Van Wyngarden DL, Chiropractic care of a patient with
vertebral subluxation and Bell’s Palsy Journal of Manipulative
and
Physiological Therapeutics. 2003 May; 26(4): 253.
2.
O'Reilly A, Pollard H, TMJ Pain and Chiropractic Adjustment - A
Pilot Study Chiropractic Journal Of Australia.
1996 Dec; 26(4): 125-9.
3. Saghafi,
D, Curl, D, Chiropractic Manipulation of Anteriorly Displaced
Temporomandibular
Disc Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics.
1995 Feb; 18(2): 98-104.
4. Alcantara
J, Plaugher G, Klemp DD, Salem C, Chiropractic Care of a Patient
With
Temporomandibular Disorder and Atlas Subluxation Journal
of
Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2002 Jan; 25(1):
63-70.
5. Schupp W, Marx G, Manual Medicine and
Kieferorthopaedie : Manual treatment of the Kiefergelenke for the
therapy of the kraniomandibulaeren Dysfunktion [Treatment of
craniomandibular dysfunction by means OF manual manipulation of the
temporomandibular joints Manual
Medicine. 2002; 40(3): 177-83
6. Curl D, Chiropractic Approaches to
Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction (TMD) Journal of the
American Chiropractic Association. 2001 Apr; 38(4): 9-17.
7. Knutson
G, Jacob M, Possible Manifestation of Temporomandibular Joint
Dysfunction
on Chiropractic Cervical X-Ray Studies Journal of
Manipulative
and Physiological Therapeutics. 1999 Jan; 22(1): 32-7.
8. Vernon H , Hu J, Neuroplasticity of
Neck/Craniofacial Pain Mechanisms: A Review of Basic Science Studies
Journal Of The Neuromusculoskeletal System. 1999 Sum;
7(2): 51-64.
9. Arcadi
V, Birth Induced TMJ Dysfunction: The Most Common Cause of
Breastfeeding Difficulties Proceedings Of The National
Conference On Chiropractic. 1993 Oct: 18-22.
10. Curl
D, The Visual Range of Motion Scale: Analysis of Mandibular
Gait
in a Chiropractic Setting Journal of
Manipulative
and Physiological Therapeutics. 1992 Feb; 15(2): 115-22.
11. Curl D, Acute closed lock of the
temporomandibular joint: manipulation paradigm and protocol Chiropractic
Technique. 1991 Feb; 3(1): 13-18.
12. Nykoliation J, Cassidy J, Manipulative
Management of the Temporomandibular Joint Pain-Dysfunction Syndrome: A
Report of Two Cases Journal Of The Canadian
Chiropractic Association. 1984 Jun; 28(2): 257-62.
13. Vernon
L, Ehrenfeld D, Treatment of temporomandibular joint syndrome
for relief of cervical spine pain: case report Journal of
Manipulative
and Physiological Therapeutics. 1982 Jun; 5(2): 79-81.
14. Pederick
FO, Developments in the Cranial Field , Chiropractic
Journal of Australia, Mar 2000;30(1):13-23.
15. Pederick FO,
A Kaminski-type evaluation of cranial adjusting, Chiropractic
Technique, Feb 1997;9(1):1-15.
16. Pederick
FO, For Debate: Cranial Adjusting -- An Overview, Chiropractic
Journal of Australia, Sep 1993; 23(3):106-12.
17. Blum
CL, The Effect of Movement, Stress and
Mechanoelectric Activity Within the Cranial Matrix, International
Journal of Orthodontics , Spr 1987; 25(1-2): 6-14.
18. Denton
DG, Craniopathy and dentistry Basal Facts , 1986,
8:4, 181-202.
19. Blum CL, Biodynamics
of the Cranium: A Survey, The Journal of Craniomandibular
Practice, Mar/May 1985: 3(2):, 164-71 .
20. Oleski
SL Smith GH, Crow WT. Radiographic Evidence of Cranial Bone Mobility
Cranio: The Journal of Craniomandibular Practice ; Jan 2002;
20(1):34-8.
21. Milani
RS; De Periere DD; Lapeyre L; Pourreyron L, "Relationship between
dental
occlusion and posture" Cranio 2000 Apr;18(2):127-34.
22. Miyata
T; Satoh T; Shimada A; Umetsu N; Takeda T; Ishigami K; Ohki K, "[The
relation between the condition of the stomatognathic system and the
condition
of whole body. I-1. Concerning the effects of a change of occlusion on
upright
posture especially on the locus of the body's gravity center]" Nippon
Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi 1988 Dec;32(6):1233-40.
23. Frumker
SC; Kyle MA, "The dentist's contribution to rehabilitation of
cervical
posture and function: orthopedic and neurological considerations in the
treatment of craniomandibular disorders" Basal Facts
1987;9(3):105-9.
24. Vernon
LF, Ehrenfeld DC Treatment of temporomandibular joint syndrome for
relief
of cervical spine pain: case report. J Manipulative Physiol Ther.
1982 Jun;5(2):79-81.
25. Fink
M, Wahling K, Stiesch-Scholz M, Tschernitschek H. The functional
relationship
between the craniomandibular system, cervical spine, and the sacroiliac
joint: a preliminary investigation. Cranio. 2003
Jul;21(3):202-8.
26. Peterson
K, A Review of Cranial Mobility, Sacral Mobility, and
Cerebrospinal Fluid Journal of the Australian
Chiropractic Association. 1982 Apr ; 12(3): 7-14.
27. Gregory,
TM. Temporomandibular Disorder Associated with Sacroiliac
Sprain
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
May 1993; 16(4): 256-65.
28. Chinappi
AS, Getzoff H, Chiropractic/Dental Cotreatment of Lumbosacral
Pain with Temporomandibular Joint Involvement Journal of
Manipulative
and Physiological Therapeutics, Nov/Dec 1996; 19(9): 607-12.
29. Chinappi
AS, Getzoff H, The dental-chiropractic cotreatment of
structural
disorders of the jaw and temporomandibular joint dysfunction, Journal
of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, Sep 1995;
18(7):
476-81.
30. Chinappi
AS, Getzoff H, A new management model for treating
structural-based disorders, dental orthopedic and chiropractic
co-treatment Journal of Manipulative and Physiological
Therapeutics, 1994; 17: 614-9.
31. Howat J,
Varley P, Complementary Therapies Chiropractic Dentistry
Monthly Feb 1998; 4(2): 16-25.
32. Esposito,
V, Leisman, G, Neuromuscular Effects of Temporomandibular
Joint Dysfunction, International Journal of Neuroscience ,
1993; 68: 3-4.